Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: A systematic review.
Identifieur interne : 000360 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000359; suivant : 000361Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: A systematic review.
Auteurs : Ross A. Clark [Australie] ; Benjamin F. Mentiplay [Australie] ; Yong-Hao Pua [Singapour] ; Kelly J. Bower [Australie]Source :
- Gait & posture [ 1879-2219 ] ; 2018.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Analyse de régression (MeSH), Analyse de variance (MeSH), Diabète (physiopathologie), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Jeune adulte (MeSH), Jeux vidéo (MeSH), Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH), Sujet âgé (MeSH), Vieillissement (physiologie), Épreuve d'effort (instrumentation), Équilibre postural (physiologie).
- MESH :
- physiologie : Vieillissement, Équilibre postural.
- physiopathologie : Diabète.
- instrumentation : Adulte, Analyse de régression, Analyse de variance, Femelle, Humains, Jeune adulte, Jeux vidéo, Reproductibilité des résultats, Sujet âgé, Épreuve d'effort.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Aging (physiology), Analysis of Variance (MeSH), Diabetes Mellitus (physiopathology), Exercise Test (instrumentation), Female (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Postural Balance (physiology), Regression Analysis (MeSH), Reproducibility of Results (MeSH), Video Games (MeSH), Young Adult (MeSH).
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Exercise Test.
- physiology : Aging, Postural Balance.
- physiopathology : Diabetes Mellitus.
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Regression Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Video Games, Young Adult.
Abstract
The use of force platform technologies to assess standing balance is common across a range of clinical areas. Numerous researchers have evaluated the low-cost Wii Balance Board (WBB) for its utility in assessing balance, with variable findings. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the reliability and concurrent validity of the WBB for assessment of static standing balance. Articles were retrieved from six databases (Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Inspec) from 2007 to 2017. After independent screening by two reviewers, 25 articles were included. Two reviewers performed the data extraction and quality assessment. Test-retest reliability was investigated in 12 studies, with intraclass correlation coefficients or Pearson's correlation values showing a range from poor to excellent reliability (range: 0.27 to 0.99). Concurrent validity (i.e. comparison with another force platform) was examined in 21 studies, and was generally found to be excellent in studies examining the association between the same outcome measures collected on both devices. For studies reporting predominantly poor to moderate validity, potentially influential factors included the choice of 1) criterion reference (e.g. not a common force platform), 2) test duration (e.g. <30 s for double leg), 3) outcome measure (e.g. comparing a centre of pressure variable from the WBB with a summary score from the force platform), 4) data acquisition platform (studies using Apple iOS reported predominantly moderate validity), and 5) low sample size. In conclusion, evidence suggests that the WBB can be used as a reliable and valid tool for assessing standing balance. Protocol registration number: PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017058122.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.022
PubMed: 29304510
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: A systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Clark, Ross A" sort="Clark, Ross A" uniqKey="Clark R" first="Ross A" last="Clark">Ross A. Clark</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: rclark@usc.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Sunshine Coast</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mentiplay, Benjamin F" sort="Mentiplay, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Mentiplay B" first="Benjamin F" last="Mentiplay">Benjamin F. Mentiplay</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: bmentipl@usc.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Sunshine Coast</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pua, Yong Hao" sort="Pua, Yong Hao" uniqKey="Pua Y" first="Yong-Hao" last="Pua">Yong-Hao Pua</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Physiotherapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: pua.yong.hao@sgh.com.sg.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Singapour</country><wicri:regionArea>Physiotherapy Department, Singapore General Hospital</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Singapore General Hospital</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bower, Kelly J" sort="Bower, Kelly J" uniqKey="Bower K" first="Kelly J" last="Bower">Kelly J. Bower</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: kbower@usc.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Sunshine Coast</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2018">2018</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:29304510</idno><idno type="pmid">29304510</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.022</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000443</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000443</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000443</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000443</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000443</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: A systematic review.</title><author><name sortKey="Clark, Ross A" sort="Clark, Ross A" uniqKey="Clark R" first="Ross A" last="Clark">Ross A. Clark</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: rclark@usc.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Sunshine Coast</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mentiplay, Benjamin F" sort="Mentiplay, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Mentiplay B" first="Benjamin F" last="Mentiplay">Benjamin F. Mentiplay</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: bmentipl@usc.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Sunshine Coast</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pua, Yong Hao" sort="Pua, Yong Hao" uniqKey="Pua Y" first="Yong-Hao" last="Pua">Yong-Hao Pua</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Physiotherapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: pua.yong.hao@sgh.com.sg.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Singapour</country><wicri:regionArea>Physiotherapy Department, Singapore General Hospital</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Singapore General Hospital</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bower, Kelly J" sort="Bower, Kelly J" uniqKey="Bower K" first="Kelly J" last="Bower">Kelly J. Bower</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: kbower@usc.edu.au.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Sunshine Coast</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Gait & posture</title><idno type="eISSN">1879-2219</idno><imprint><date when="2018" type="published">2018</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Aging (physiology)</term><term>Analysis of Variance (MeSH)</term><term>Diabetes Mellitus (physiopathology)</term><term>Exercise Test (instrumentation)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Postural Balance (physiology)</term><term>Regression Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results (MeSH)</term><term>Video Games (MeSH)</term><term>Young Adult (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Analyse de régression (MeSH)</term><term>Analyse de variance (MeSH)</term><term>Diabète (physiopathologie)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Jeune adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Jeux vidéo (MeSH)</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats (MeSH)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term><term>Vieillissement (physiologie)</term><term>Épreuve d'effort (instrumentation)</term><term>Équilibre postural (physiologie)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Exercise Test</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Vieillissement</term><term>Équilibre postural</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Aging</term><term>Postural Balance</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Diabète</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Diabetes Mellitus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Video Games</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Analyse de régression</term><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Jeux vidéo</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Épreuve d'effort</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The use of force platform technologies to assess standing balance is common across a range of clinical areas. Numerous researchers have evaluated the low-cost Wii Balance Board (WBB) for its utility in assessing balance, with variable findings. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the reliability and concurrent validity of the WBB for assessment of static standing balance. Articles were retrieved from six databases (Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Inspec) from 2007 to 2017. After independent screening by two reviewers, 25 articles were included. Two reviewers performed the data extraction and quality assessment. Test-retest reliability was investigated in 12 studies, with intraclass correlation coefficients or Pearson's correlation values showing a range from poor to excellent reliability (range: 0.27 to 0.99). Concurrent validity (i.e. comparison with another force platform) was examined in 21 studies, and was generally found to be excellent in studies examining the association between the same outcome measures collected on both devices. For studies reporting predominantly poor to moderate validity, potentially influential factors included the choice of 1) criterion reference (e.g. not a common force platform), 2) test duration (e.g. <30 s for double leg), 3) outcome measure (e.g. comparing a centre of pressure variable from the WBB with a summary score from the force platform), 4) data acquisition platform (studies using Apple iOS reported predominantly moderate validity), and 5) low sample size. In conclusion, evidence suggests that the WBB can be used as a reliable and valid tool for assessing standing balance. Protocol registration number: PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017058122.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Curated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">29304510</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2018</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>18</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1879-2219</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>61</Volume><PubDate><Year>2018</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Gait & posture</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Gait Posture</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: A systematic review.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>40-54</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0966-6362(17)31051-2</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.022</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The use of force platform technologies to assess standing balance is common across a range of clinical areas. Numerous researchers have evaluated the low-cost Wii Balance Board (WBB) for its utility in assessing balance, with variable findings. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the reliability and concurrent validity of the WBB for assessment of static standing balance. Articles were retrieved from six databases (Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Inspec) from 2007 to 2017. After independent screening by two reviewers, 25 articles were included. Two reviewers performed the data extraction and quality assessment. Test-retest reliability was investigated in 12 studies, with intraclass correlation coefficients or Pearson's correlation values showing a range from poor to excellent reliability (range: 0.27 to 0.99). Concurrent validity (i.e. comparison with another force platform) was examined in 21 studies, and was generally found to be excellent in studies examining the association between the same outcome measures collected on both devices. For studies reporting predominantly poor to moderate validity, potentially influential factors included the choice of 1) criterion reference (e.g. not a common force platform), 2) test duration (e.g. <30 s for double leg), 3) outcome measure (e.g. comparing a centre of pressure variable from the WBB with a summary score from the force platform), 4) data acquisition platform (studies using Apple iOS reported predominantly moderate validity), and 5) low sample size. In conclusion, evidence suggests that the WBB can be used as a reliable and valid tool for assessing standing balance. Protocol registration number: PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017058122.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Clark</LastName><ForeName>Ross A</ForeName><Initials>RA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: rclark@usc.edu.au.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mentiplay</LastName><ForeName>Benjamin F</ForeName><Initials>BF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: bmentipl@usc.edu.au.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pua</LastName><ForeName>Yong-Hao</ForeName><Initials>YH</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Physiotherapy Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: pua.yong.hao@sgh.com.sg.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bower</LastName><ForeName>Kelly J</ForeName><Initials>KJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: kbower@usc.edu.au.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D000078182">Systematic Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Gait Posture</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9416830</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0966-6362</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000375" MajorTopicYN="N">Aging</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003920" MajorTopicYN="N">Diabetes Mellitus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005080" MajorTopicYN="N">Exercise Test</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004856" MajorTopicYN="N">Postural Balance</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018910" MajorTopicYN="Y">Video Games</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Force platform</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Nintendo</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Posturography</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Reliability</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Validity</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Wii</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>17</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2017</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>22</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2018</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2018</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2018</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29304510</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0966-6362(17)31051-2</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.022</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li><li>Singapour</li></country></list><tree><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Clark, Ross A" sort="Clark, Ross A" uniqKey="Clark R" first="Ross A" last="Clark">Ross A. Clark</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Bower, Kelly J" sort="Bower, Kelly J" uniqKey="Bower K" first="Kelly J" last="Bower">Kelly J. Bower</name><name sortKey="Mentiplay, Benjamin F" sort="Mentiplay, Benjamin F" uniqKey="Mentiplay B" first="Benjamin F" last="Mentiplay">Benjamin F. Mentiplay</name></country><country name="Singapour"><noRegion><name sortKey="Pua, Yong Hao" sort="Pua, Yong Hao" uniqKey="Pua Y" first="Yong-Hao" last="Pua">Yong-Hao Pua</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PosturoV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000360 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000360 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= PosturoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:29304510
|texte= Reliability and validity of the Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance: A systematic review.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:29304510" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PosturoV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |